I hope that you have enjoyed the article “The Target Pricing Controversy.”

Don’t miss updates on Procurement & Supply Chain, Subscribe here!

One argument that opponents of target pricing use is that “if you set a supplier’s price, you may be leaving money on the table.” In other words, the supplier may have offered a lower price if you gave them a chance to do so.

As I teach in “Powerful Negotiation For Successful Buying,” in many cases you don’t want to ever disclose your price targets to your supplier. But under the conditions described in the article, there are times when it is appropriate to do so.

Again, it has to be for the right type of purchase. Custom products that your organization has designed and internally-performed services that you want to outsource are two prime examples.

Do you have experience with or an opinion about target pricing? Share your comments here!

To Your Career,
Charles Dominick, SPSM
President & Chief Procurement Officer
Next Level Purchasing, Inc.
Struggling To Have A Rewarding Purchasing Career?
Earn Your SPSM Certification Online At

Charles Dominick, SPSM, SPSM2, SPSM3

Charles Dominick, SPSM, SPSM2, SPSM3 is an internationally-recognized business expert, legendary procurement thought leader, award-winning entrepreneur, and provocative blogger. Charles founded the Next Level Purchasing Association in 2000, oversaw its incredible growth, and successfully led the organization to its acquisition by the Certitrek Group in 2016. He continues to blog and provide advisory services for the NLPA on a part-time basis as he incubates his upcoming business innovations. Charles is also the co-author of the wildly popular, groundbreaking book, "The Procurement Game Plan: Winning Strategies & Techniques For Supply Management Professionals."

More Posts