Another day, another global sourcing controversy.

Don’t miss updates on Procurement & Supply Chain, Subscribe here!

Today’s controversy has stemmed from China Labor Watch’s new report about a Chinese supplier of Apple, Pegatron.  This report summarized an investigation in which China Labor Watch found working conditions at Pegatron and its subsidiaries to be far worse than those found by Apple’s own audits.

However, it doesn’t appear that Apple was failing to acknowledge the risk of social responsibility issues or turning a blind eye towards potential violations of its supplier code of conduct.  In a statement quoted by, Apple claimed that it had “conducted 15 comprehensive audits at Pegatron facilities since 2007, covering more than 130,000 workers making Apple products including annual audits of Pegatron’s final assembly locations and surprise audits at [two Pegatron subsidiaries named in the report] within the past 18 months.”

In my view, Apple makes a valiant effort at publicly communicating about its socially responsible purchasing initiatives, acknowledging that problems exist when they do, and generally talking a good game about making things better.  Yet reports like this latest one from China Labor Watch continue to come out and take aim at Apple and other big companies that offshore their production to low cost locations.

So, my question is:  if a well-written supplier code of conduct and two or three audits per year – including surprise audits – are not enough to keep global suppliers honest, what will it take to eliminate controversies in the global supply chain?  More audits?  On-site, 24/7 procurement supervision?  Collaboration with governmental authorities?  Moving production out of certain high-risk countries permanently, regardless of any cost advantage?  Some other solution?

I’d love to say the answer would be to do business only with suppliers you trust.  But I don’t believe the solution is that simple today.

Sometimes, one has to wonder if companies have a “secret number” – an amount of money in cost savings that will actually make it feel “worth it” to have to deal with the occasional media-fueled social responsibility controversy.

I hope not.  But, sometimes, even I begin to be skeptical about the seemingly high tolerance levels for bad publicity that some companies have as related to questionable global sourcing choices.

To Your Career Success,
Charles Dominick, SPSM, SPSM2, SPSM3
President & Chief Procurement Officer – Next Level Purchasing Association
Co-Author – The Procurement Game Plan
Struggling To Have A Rewarding Purchasing Career?
Earn Your SPSM® Certification Online At


Charles Dominick, SPSM, SPSM2, SPSM3

Charles Dominick, SPSM, SPSM2, SPSM3 is an internationally-recognized business expert, legendary procurement thought leader, award-winning entrepreneur, and provocative blogger. Charles founded the Next Level Purchasing Association in 2000, oversaw its incredible growth, and successfully led the organization to its acquisition by the Certitrek Group in 2016. He continues to blog and provide advisory services for the NLPA on a part-time basis as he incubates his upcoming business innovations. Charles is also the co-author of the wildly popular, groundbreaking book, "The Procurement Game Plan: Winning Strategies & Techniques For Supply Management Professionals."

More Posts